The God concept seems to imply that nobody should hate anybody else for God would not hold a person in existence unless that person was dear to him meaning that since God comes first we should not hate anybody for his sake. Some would say partly for his sake but these would be renouncing the Judeo-Christian scriptures which forbid this and say we must give all for him and submit entirely to his will.
Nobody however promotes God as being a good thing to believe in for it justifies opposition to hate. Nobody says that hate is bad in itself and that is undeniable but that the value of believing in God is that it gives you an extra reason to work against hate.
Religion cannot say it is a sin to wish anybody would go to Hell or die as long as you have the right motive – to see God do the right thing or his own will. A bad motive for doing something nice or helpful is not as bad as hurting people severely for a good motive. It is better to ignore the bad motive somebody had for doing wrong than to believe they should go to Hell if they die unrepentant. Not to do so is unkind. But if God comes first then it is better to hope that people go to Hell for his sake. They do not come first.
God can only love himself for he is goodness itself and we are flawed underlings so the God concept does not automatically imply that there is no room for hating. To forbid hate would be madness for he made us to suffer for him and all he cares about is himself.
If God only holds things in existence because he loves them then he loves the fly in the jam as much as all the human beings on earth.
Some say that it can’t be wrong to hate a person who will never die or who will not be harmed by it. They think that hate is bad simply because it can result in suffering and murder. But if we live forever then suffering isn’t very serious no matter how bad it is and death is nothing. If those people are right, then if you like hating, it seems you should for you are valuing yourself instead of that person. You should do that for you are most sure you exist.
You will not be able to hate a person unless you believe in free will. God implies free will is true for it is supposed to be human misuse of free will that caused evil not God. Thus God is an evil doctrine. The person who denies free will hates what a person does but not the person and wishes the imbalance was fixed. The reason he can do this is because the bad act was programmed. The person did not freely do the act.
Hate is a nasty vindictive attitude and whether it is directed at people or things that does not make any difference. It is still vindictive. Christians say that God hates sin. A God who hates a thing that is only an idea is not to be trusted. Sin is an abstract valuation. It is like 2+2 being 5. It is not a thing like a doughnut or a tree. He is evil if he asks us to trust him for if he hates then he cannot be trusted.
Hate is the urge to hurt another person just because you want to see them hurt. Most who discourage hate argue that it is to be avoided for it gets too easily out of control and your perception gets distorted more and more all the time as it becomes a habit. Your view of others becomes polluted and bitter. Most people see hate as a Pandora's Box and this is their main reason to oppose hate. Such a view suggests that hate is not bad in itself as long as it can be kept within boundaries. This makes you suspicious of those Christians who claim to believe in hating the sin and loving the sinner - they are trying to smugly hide their hate and are examples of passive aggressive hate. And there are people who seem - who seem! a seem does not amount to an are! - capable of restraining hate. Incredibly, religion claims to be good while it makes the desire to hurt sin or hurt people far more fierce.
All sin offends God infinitely for he hates it that much for he is infinitely good so it makes no difference if you commit murder or if you just wish ill on somebody. How then could it be make any difference if we abuse anybody? It would make even less if we abuse a stubborn sinner!
God is a doctrine of hate for sinners.
Belief in God makes you less moral not more. Thus any belief in supernatural beings is automatically and intrinsically fundamentalist. Why stop with such belief? Why not go further and advocate the killing of anybody you hear cursing God?

A HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, VOL 6, PART II, KANT, Frederick Copleston SJ, Doubleday/Image, New York 1964
AQUINAS, FC Copleston, Penguin Books, London, 1991
BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL, Friedrich Nietzsche, Penguin, London, 1990
BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER, Association for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge, Dublin, 1960
CHARITY, MEDITATIONS FOR A MONTH, Richard F Clarke SJ, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1973
CHRISTIANITY FOR THE TOUGH-MINDED, Edited by John Warwick Montgomery, Bethany Fellowship, Minnesota, 1973
CRISIS OF MORAL AUTHORITY, Don Cupitt, SCM Press, London, 1995
EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT, VOL 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press Foundation, Bucks, 1995
ECUMENICAL JIHAD, Peter Kreeft, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1996
GOD IS NOT GREAT, THE CASE AGAINST RELIGION, Christopher Hitchens, Atlantic Books, London, 2007
GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri, Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS, Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli, Monarch, East Sussex, 1995
HONEST TO GOD, John AT Robinson, SCM, London, 1963
HOW DOES GOD LOVE ME? Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1986
IN DEFENCE OF THE FAITH, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1996
MADAME GUYON, MARTYR OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, Phyllis Thompson, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1986
MORAL PHILOSOPHY, Joseph Rickaby SJ, Stonyhurst Philosophy Series, Longmans Green and Co, London, 1912
OXFORD DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY, Simon Blackburn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996
PRACTICAL ETHICS, Peter Singer, Cambridge University Press, England, 1994
PSYCHOLOGY, George A Miller, Penguin, London, 1991
RADIO REPLIES, 1, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota, 1938
RADIO REPLIES, 2, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota, 1940
RADIO REPLIES, 3, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota, 1942
REASON AND BELIEF, Brand Blanschard, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1974
REASONS FOR HOPE, Ed Jeffrey A Mirus, Christendom College Press, Virginia, 1982
THE ATONEMENT: MYSTERY OF RECONCILIATION, Kevin McNamara, Archbishop of Dublin, Veritas, Dublin, 1987
SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD, Jonathan Edwards, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, undated
THE BIBLE TELLS US SO, R B Kuiper, The Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh, 1978
THE CASE FOR FAITH, Lee Strobel, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2000
The Future of Atheism, Alister McGrath and Daniel Dennett, SPCK, London , 2008
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri, Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
THE IMITATION OF CHRIST, Thomas A Kempis, Translated by Ronald Knox and Michael Oakley, Universe, Burns & Oates, London, 1963
THE LIFE OF ALL LIVING, Fulton J Sheen, Image Books, New York, 1979
THE NEW WALK, Captain Reginald Wallis, The Christian Press, Pembridge Villas, England, undated
THE PRACTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF GOD, Brother Lawrence, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1981
THE PROBLEM OF PAIN, CS Lewis, Fontana, London, 1972
THE PUZZLE OF GOD, Peter Vardy, Collins, London, 1990
THE SATANIC BIBLE, Anton Szandor LaVey, Avon Books, New York, 1969
THE SPIRITUAL GUIDE, Michael Molinos, Christian Books, Gardiner Maine, 1982
THE STUDENT’S CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, Rev Charles Hart BA, Burns & Oates, London, 1961
UNBLIND FAITH, Michael J Langford, SCM, London, 1982

No Copyright