Do we prevent somebody being hurt by superstition or faith by rejecting and challenging those things? 

Is it mistaken to support organised religion in membership or donations?

If people do good because they are human, not because God prompts them then is it right to risk giving God any credit when they alone own their good?

 


 

Nobody has the right to believe in miracles without checking the evidence.  Even more so nobody has the right to spread unchecked miracle claims.  Too low of a standard threatens truth and information.

HOW MUCH EVIDENCE AND WHAT KIND DO YOU NEED FOR MIRACLES?

Bigger the Commitment a Miracle Faith asks for, Bigger the Evidence you Need

Miracles need maximal and extreme investigation before warranting belief

Can only miracles verify miracles?

Even Small Miracles Need Amazing Evidence

Exceptional Evidence is Needed for the Christian Miracles - how the Christians Fail to Provide it

Mammoth Proof for Miracles Please - it is what is Needed!

Miracle - Evidence Illusion

Miracles and Why the Testimony of Logic has more weight than the Testimony of Evidence

Miracles are So Big that Testimony is Futile if You want to Verify Them

Religion lies that it sees miracles as God's testimony to the truth not man's

Miracles - is it hard evidence we need or is testimony enough?

Need to See Miracles Yourself If You Want to Believe!

One faiths miracle-signs oppose the miracle-signs of another faith

Only Skeptical Witnesses Should Be Listened to if a Miracle Claim is Made

Reluctance to believe is necessary and a lot of evidence needed to overcome it

Scepticism is a good habit and a virtue

Testing a Witness to an Alleged Miracle

The Bigger the Miracle then the Bigger the Evidence You need to Defend the Reality of the Miracle

The Skeptic's Tools

Virtue of Prudence requires we seek good evidence before believing in miracles

You Need Exceptionally Good Evidence if You Want to Believe in Miracles