Do we prevent somebody being hurt by superstition or faith by rejecting and challenging those things? 

Is it mistaken to support organised religion in membership or donations?

If people do good because they are human, not because God prompts them then is it right to risk giving God any credit when they alone own their good?

 


GOD IS NOT YOUR HERO FOR HE HAS NOTHING TO STRIVE AGAINST FOR HE HAS ALL POWER

A God who has nothing to strive against and who can make planets go out of existence and come back into existence and who has no reasonable limitations is not a God for heroes. He cannot be admired as a hero. As Jordan Peterson said of Superman, A superhero who can do anything turns out to be no hero at all. Hes nothing specific, so hes nothing. He has nothing to strive against, so he cant be admirable. Being of any reasonable sort appears to require limitation. Perhaps this is because Being requires Becoming, perhaps, as well as static existence and to become is to become something more, or at least something different. That is only possible for something limited.

The hero who is a hero because of a God who cannot be a hero is a fool not a hero.  Foolhardy and hero cannot be said in the same breath.